|
AID-India Progress Report on Tsunami Relief, Rehabilitation and Community Rebuilding Programs |
|
|
Page 36 of 37 How is Tsunami impacting the rest of the villages in Tamilnadu ? It is also disturbing to see many good NGOs leaving their regular work and moving to work in the Tsunami areas. A lot more money than is possibly needed or can be used efficiently has been raised by so many organizations across the world for Tsunami relief. This money has come at a cost. Some donations were ‘extras’ – new donations that would have otherwise not gone into other programs. But most donations were just shifted from other programs into the Tsunami. A lot of NGOs across Tamilnadu have been providing health, education, livelihood and other services. Most of the funds that went to these programs have been shifted into Tsunami relief. These NGOs find that they cannot get funds for their regular programs. But they need funds to support their staff and therefore are pushed to work in the Tsunami areas. This has led to an excess of NGOs and attention and funds in the 300 or so Tsunami villages and a sudden withdrawals of funds and attention and people working in other areas. This could mean a worsening of health, education and livelihood status in most of the areas. In a way, the rest of the villages in Tamilnadu are slowly bearing the cost of the Tsunami. What does Tsunami relief and rehabilitation mean? A friend I met sometime ago expressed a very narrow definition of Tsunami relief and rehabilitation. When I mentioned to him that we are helping appoint additional teachers in government schools which had only one teacher and were providing teaching learning materials to several schools, he said “But these were not there even before the Tsunami. How was it affected by the Tsunami? Donors have given money only to put back what was lost during the Tsunami.” Following this logic to its conclusion will lead to the following absurdities! To say donors have given money only for such a narrow definition of Tsunami relief and rehabilitation is an insult to most donors. I have been interacting with a large number of donors and find that what they really want is for their funds to be used most effectively and to help the poorest and most needy. In fact many donors gave money with the clear idea that we should make the living conditions in the Tsunami areas much better than what it was earlier. We should keep a broad perspective in mind and use the funds to work towards bringing about overall improvements in the area – both in the directly and indirectly affected villages.
|